Penn Medicine x CHTI: Reducing Regulated Medical Waste (RMW)

A comprehensive redesign of the waste management system in the Operating Rooms (ORs) at the Hospital of University of Pennsylvania (HUP) - aimed to significantly reduce Regulated Medical Waste (RMW).
Role
Design Consultant, UX Researcher
Timeline
10 weeks, Spring 2024
Tools | Skills
Figma, Rhino, Procreate | UX Research, Industrial Design, Design Strategy
Results
  • Presented the redesigned waste system, which reduced mis-sorted RMW by over 10%, to design executives at HUP and the Center for Healthcare Transformation and Innovation (CHTI)
  • Validated concepts through user research and in-hospital A/B testing
  • Developed mid-fidelity, physical prototypes that served a strong foundation for further innovation
  • Created an interactive experience to educate healthcare workers on proper waste management, which was further developed into a hospital training procedure after we left
Overview
Background

In the healthcare sector, waste is divided into two primary categories: medical waste and regulated medical waste (RMW). RMW includes blood-soaked items, making it bio-hazardous and requiring separate disposal into a different bin. RMW is also more environmentally harmful, more labor-intensive to manage, and significantly more expensive to treat than general medical waste. Additionally, the treatment facilities for RMW are often located near disadvantaged communities, disproportionately affecting their health. Despite these serious negative impacts, proper waste management often takes a back seat to other pressing priorities that healthcare workers must address.
"How Might We Transform the Waste Disposal Process to Minimize Mis-sorted RMW?"
Through observational studies, user interviews, and in-hospital testing, our team designed both physical and systemic solutions aimed at reducing waste-sorting errors at Penn's hospital, with a specific emphasis on decreasing RMW.
Overview
Scope
Target Users
  • Healthcare Providers and Environmental Services (EVS) at HUP
Research Methods
  • Existing stystem
  • Qualitative research (interviews)
  • Observation (in hospital)
  • Historical research
Waste Practices at HUP
Out of the 5 billion pounds of medical waste generated in the US every year, the CDC recommends that only 3% should be classified as RMW.

HUP generates nearly 10x the CDC's recommendation
- with 27.9% of its total waste being RMW.

In its pursuit of greater sustainability, Penn Medicine committed in 2024 to an ambitious national pledge to significantly reduce, and ultimately eliminate, carbon emissions by 2050. Cutting down RMW is a critical step toward achieving this goal.
Research
C-Section Observations
Click image to enlarge
We observed two C-section procedures to understand how healthcare workers manage medical waste in real time — all while navigating unexpected challenges, time constraints, and the demands of prioritizing patient care.
Previous Interventions Review
We also consulted with two medical students who had previously tackled waste-sorting challenges at HUP to gain insights into the most effective initiatives and identify designs to avoid.
Intervention 1 - Educational Nurse Huddles
Monthly 30-minute educational huddles led by volunteer medical students to train nursing staff on proper waste management procedures.
Limitations
  • Inconsistent engagement from staff
  • High effort
  • Minimal reach and impact
Intervention 2 - Educational Stickers
Postcard-sized stickers on red waste bins, clearly outlining what items should be disposed of in the bin.
Limitations
  • Lack of metrics in tracking changes in mis-sorted waste
  • Limited visibility
  • Required workers to pause and read
Healthcare Worker Interviews
The team conducted formal and intercept interviews with 25+ healthcare workers to gain deeper insights into their workflows and assess their understanding and accuracy in waste-sorting. We found that:
Healthcare Workers Do Not Prioritize Accurately Sorting Waste In Their Daily Routines.
Workers overly depend on RMW bins.
The stressful demands of their roles, combined with unclear waste management guidelines and inconvenient OR bin layouts, often lead workers to discard most of their waste into RMW bins — even when it isn’t blood-soaked.
There is no personal incentive to sorting waste properly.
Proper waste sorting lowers hospital costs and minimizes environmental impact, but healthcare workers often feel disconnected from these benefits. Facing the highest infection risk from improperly sorted RMW, they commonly follow the motto: "When in doubt, throw it out (in red)."
Synthesizing Insights
Re-Imagining the Waste System
The team collaborated with design strategists at CHTI to consolidate key insights and identify primary stakeholders. It took several weeks of planning, diagraming, and collecting feedback to define a design direction and formulate a hypothesis.
Ultimately, the team hypothesized that:
Emphasizing the municipal waste bin as the default option will help reduce the amount of mis-sorted RMW.
Given the minimal impact of previous educational efforts, we opted for a different strategy— altering the OR layout and redesigning the physical bins to emphasize the municipal bins. This approach aimed to change healthcare workers' behaviors subconsciously, without requiring additional effort on their part.
Current Waste System Experience
The current OR typically has:
The overabundance of RMW bins compared to municipal bins leads workers to frequently discard regular waste into RMW bins. Furthermore, the placement and design of these bins increases the risk of infection and requires workers to walk long distances to properly dispose of waste.
Overflowing RMW bins, consisting of 90% mis-sorted municipal waste
Inconvenient kick bucket placement forces workers to throw bloody gauze across considerable distances
Flawed canister disposal design fails to keep canisters upright, leading to the spillage of contaminated waste.
Ideation
Design Criteria
Based on research and observational insights, the team established the following design criteria for our re-imagined waste system:
New Waste System Experience
After refining our top ideas, we chose three that work together to create a more sustainable and efficient waste system. These solutions utilize the physical environment to subtly encourage workers to be more intentional about their waste disposal habits.
Solution 1 - Combo Bin
This design features a large municipal bin with a detachable smaller RMW bin attached to the side, ensuring users always have the option to utilize the municipal bin rather than defaulting to the RMW bin.
Solution 2 - Table-side Bin
This table-side bin enables users to dispose of various types of waste (municipal, recycling, and RMW) within arm's reach, removing the need to throw waste into inconveniently placed kick buckets. It features a clamp mechanism for easy mobility, allowing it to adapt to different OR layouts and worker preferences. After procedures, EVS can quickly detach the plastic bags from the bin's frame for efficient disposal.
Solution 3 - Cylindrical Canister Bin
Our third solution is a cylindrical bin specifically designed for the disposal of canisters. Its shape prevents canisters from toppling over and spilling contaminated contents. Users can easily drop used canisters into the bin, allowing them to slide down securely into a stack. A hatch on the side functions like a gate, enabling EVS to open the cylinder and effortlessly remove the canisters for disposal.
Prototyping & Testing
Lo-Fi Prototypes
The team created low-fidelity prototypes of each concept using laser cutting, 3D modeling, and modifications of existing products.
Combo Bin
Table-side Bin
Cylindrical Canister Bin
Testing
Participants (16)
  • Nurses, Doctors, Medical students at HUP
  • Familiar with OR setting and procedures
Goals
  • Determine whether the new waste system resonates with workers and improves efficiency
  • Track metrics to assess whether RMW is reduced and waste is sorted more accurately
  • Gather feedback on ways to enhance integration into the workflow and OR setting
The team conducted A/B test sessions in simulation ORs where groups of healthcare workers competed to complete as many puzzles as possible, simulating the concentration and time pressures of surgical operations. Periodically, during the competition, the groups were given various types of fake waste to sort correctly. These tests were performed twice: once using the current waste system and once with our redesigned waste system to compare their effectiveness.
Current Waste System
Redesigned Waste System
Workers competing to complete Tangram puzzles against the clock
Workers sorting a mix of fake waste
Workers utilizing redesigned waste system
Results
Takeaways
01
Efficient Design in High-Stakes Healthcare
Designing within the healthcare space presented a unique challenge, as we had to be extremely mindful not to add any extra steps to the users' workflow. Designers typically aim to simplify and streamline user experiences, and this was especially crucial in healthcare, where even a few seconds can mean the difference between life and death. Therefore, we needed to find ways to encourage the desired behaviors from our users without adding any additional burden to their daily responsibilities.
02
Guiding Behavior Through Environmental Design
Rather than explicitly instructing users on desired behaviors, I recognized the value in subtly guiding them by adapting physical designs and the environment, making behavior change feel like an unconscious decision.
03
The Power of User Feedback
Direct engagement with healthcare workers and observing their daily workflows was incredibly insightful—not just for guiding our design refinements, but also for fostering a deeper appreciation of the extraordinary care and dedication they provide.
sylius@seas.upenn.edu
This website is best viewed on desktop
Made with love © Sophia Liu